

+ bool ' USB Keyspan USA-49WLC Firmware' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA49WLCĭep_tristate ' USB MCT Single Port Serial Driver' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_MCT_U232 $CONFIG_USB_SERIALĭep_tristate ' USB KL5KUSB105 (Palmconnect) Driver' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KLSI $CONFIG_USB_SERIAL + bool ' USB Keyspan MPR Firmware' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_MPRīool ' USB Keyspan USA-49W Firmware' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA49W +++ linux/drivers/usb/serial/Config.inğri Feb 21 09:21:04 -30,7 +30,9 ' USB Keyspan USA-19W Firmware' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA19Wīool ' USB Keyspan USA-19QW Firmware' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA19QWīool ' USB Keyspan USA-19QI Firmware' CONFIG_USB_SERIAL_KEYSPAN_USA19QI The 49WLC device works fine with this patch. the Config.in file didn't need all those changes. Though I've been reading it for many years. That was my very first post to the list even > And does this patch work with the new devices? > Thanks for doing this, but why did you modify the Config.in file so > Any reason you didn't send this to the listed maintainer for these > is current and they didn't want my patches. > of the Keyspan USB/Serial adapter products (49WLC and MPR). > I'm not sure why, but the current kernel source tree doesn't support some > On Thu, at 03:28:35PM -0800, System Administrator wrote: In reply to: Greg KH: "Re: Keyspan USB/Serial Drivers for 2.4.20/2.4.21-pre4".Bligh: "Re: Strange performance change 59 -> 61/62" Next message: chas williams: "Re: cli() for net/atm/lec.c".Linux-Kernel Archive: Re: Keyspan USB/Serial Drivers fo Re: Keyspan USB/Serial Drivers for 2.4.20/2.4.21-pre4 From: System Administrator ( Fri 12:28:28 EST
